I agree with use of contact lenses as well. We mustn't oversimplify splash goggles either. There are vented, indirect vented, and unvented splash goggles. I need to recommend even different types of splash goggles for different purposes in my work. Eye protection is not Monona Rossol In a message dated 11/13/04 6:21:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, Labsafe**At_Symbol_Here**AOL.COM writes: > Phil is absolutely right. Chemical splash does need goggles. But the > problem is that many folks can't, don't, or won't distinguish between impact > and > chemical splash goggles. > > So, saying goggles in simply insufficient. One must say chemical splash > goggle for a chemical splash. And ANSI/ASSE could do us all a big favor by > asking > the manufacturer to put the selection chart letter after the Z-87.1 to > indicate the type of device. > > Concerning contact lenses, they do it for good reason. Six years ago, after > five years of study, the ACS Council Committee on Chemical Safety joined > other > major organizations (Prevent Blindness America, American Optometric > Association) and many companies (Dow, 3M, and DuPont) by agreeing that > contact lenses > are acceptable as long as all the other necessary eye protection is worn. > > So, I for one am not the least bit upset about contact lens use and very much > agree with the ACS position. ... Jim > >
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post