=0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: William Parks=0D Date: 03/10/06 13:32:13=0D To: actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**cs.com=0D Subject: Unexpected outcomes=0D =0D =0D In response to question 1, boiling ether is usually something I as a safety=0D professional recommend not happen. The boiling point is very low, the vap or=0D concentration can build quickly, and as was discovered, the vapor is also =0D extremely flammable.=0D If boiling ether is a requirement, I recommend that the ventilation rate=0D inside the hood be increased to extract vapors more quickly, and maybe he at=0D the flask in a water bath instead of directly on the burner. This will mo st=0D likely take longer to produce the end result, but should be much safer. A lso=0D keeping in mind the when compounds spontainiously ignite, if the contai ner=0D is closed, an explosion could occur, spreading the burning liquid and=0D flammable gases into the lab and away from the protection of the hood. Th e=0D hood should also be checked by a ventilation expert prior to reuse after the=0D fire to insure proper working condition.=0D =0D Question 2.=0D =0D Water baths work both ways. If the flask is placed in a water bath for=0D heating, when the heat portion is completed, the bath is turned off, and the=0D liquid cools naturally, and slowly. These are 2 very important words to=0D remember when heating and cooling highly flammable substances: easy and=0D slowly.=0D =0D I can be reached directly at 479/685-9343, and can help you find a=0D professional to assist with the fume hood.=0D =0D Bill Parks=0D R.I.H.=0D Chemphyxx=0D =0D **Providing quality Occupational Safety and Health, Industrial Hygiene, a nd Environmental services**
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post