Ralph,
You asked:
Is it reasonable to expect articles about chemicals written for an educated segment of the public to include information related to the risks of the chemicals being discussed in the context that they are being used?
I think that audience should control the depth of the article and vocabulary choices. The objective of the article should dictate what pieces of other information are included, regardless of the audience.
If the article discusses only the science behind the mechanism of disinfection, then it wouldn't be expected to include safety information. One could probably write a whole separate article on the toxicity of hand sanitizers, but, even then, I would not expect additional safety information to be included.
An article describing how to make an ethanol based hand sanitizer, on the other hand, should include basic safety information because it's teaching the art (to use a patent term). I would expect such article to include other tidbits of important safety information... like... don't substitute methanol for ethanol, nor 1-propanol for 2-propanol...
Yaritza
-----Original Message----- ** External Email ** > >The Unicorn Glue experiment recommends insulated gloves, but the photos show the experimenter working without any gloves. On a related science communication topic, I was reading a chemistry article written for high school teachers today. It explains why ethanol is used in hand sanitizers. It went into pretty significant detail with regard to biochemistry, viral structure and the history of disinfectants as a medical technique. The article does mention that hand washing is more effective than using hand sanitizers as one down side of their use. While these risks aren‰??t generated at the molecular level that the article describes, they are important considerations for the way these disinfectants are used. Is it reasonable to expect articles about chemicals written for an educated segment of the public to include information related to the risks of the chemicals being discussed in the context that they are being used? Personally, I think that a habit of an explicitly associating flammable and toxic mixtures (perhaps described in GHS terms) would be a public service that the technical press could provide. Thanks for any thoughts on this. - Ralph Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO ralph.stuart**At_Symbol_Here**keene.edu --- Electronic Transmission Confidentiality Notice ---
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post
From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2020 7:39 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] C&EN: Thoughts on Kate the Chemist's "The Big Book of Experiments"?
>
This is a red flag for me - a picture is worth a thousand words when it come to delivering a message about expectations
doesn‰??t mention either that 1) 60% ethanol hand sanitizers are flammable or that 2) ethanol can have toxic effects through dermal adsorption.
Environmental Safety Manager
Keene State College
603 358-2859
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
The information contained in this electronic transmission is private, confidential, the property of the sender, and intended for the use of the recipient(s), only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information for any purpose is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender, YBrinker**At_Symbol_Here**fele.com, immediately by e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you.
[FE.EN.1]
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas